Platform and aggregator rather than a model trainer — their Prism model is a fine-tuned Tripo, plus they offer Hunyuan 3.0, Meshy, and more on the same platform. Probably the biggest AI studio available, covering image generation, editing, and extensive 3D tools all in one place.
Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · Studio · AI Texturing · Image · Commercial Use · AI Rigging · Split into Parts
Platform and aggregator rather than a model trainer — their Prism model is a fine-tuned Tripo, plus they offer Hunyuan 3.0, Meshy, and more on the same platform. Probably the biggest AI studio available, covering image generation, editing, and extensive 3D tools all in one place.
Prism (3D AI Studio) · 2 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 2
Follow Prism (3D AI Studio) on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @3DAIStudioCommunity rating · out of 5
Community rating
24 ratings · 5 written reviews
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#20 / 24
Textured ELO
923
Geometry ELO
912
Win Rate
43%
818 wins · 1,081 losses
Total: 1,899 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.20
Typical runtime: 5.8 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#19 · 950 ELO
In January 26, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (923 ELO), compared with #19 (950 ELO) for Seed3D v1.0.
Seed3D v1.0 holds a 27 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 45% for Seed3D v1.0.
#21 · 902 ELO
In January 26, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (923 ELO), compared with #21 (902 ELO) for YVO3D 1.0.
Forge v2.0 maintains a 21 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for YVO3D 1.0.
YVO3D 1.0 often returns meshes quicker (3.7 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#18 · 955 ELO
In January 26, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (923 ELO), compared with #18 (955 ELO) for Prism v2.5.
Prism v2.5 holds a 32 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 48% for Prism v2.5.
Prism v2.5 often returns meshes quicker (3.3 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
#22 · 880 ELO
In January 26, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (923 ELO), compared with #22 (880 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Forge v2.0 maintains a 43 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
During this season, Forge v2.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 37% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Forge v2.0 focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for Forge v2.0 in January 26?
In January 26, Forge v2.0 finished at #20 with 923 ELO and 1,899 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with Forge v2.0?
Forge v2.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.20 per test with a typical runtime of 5.8 min.
How did Forge v2.0 compare with Seed3D v1.0 in January 26?
In January 26, Forge v2.0 ranked #20 (923 ELO), compared with #19 (950 ELO) for Seed3D v1.0. Seed3D v1.0 holds a 27 point advantage, so Forge v2.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, Forge v2.0 won 43% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 45% for Seed3D v1.0.
