One of the first to offer 3D AI, training their own models. Nice ecosystem with texturing, rigging, parts, and a 'Create a Kit' feature for generating multiple objects from one image with built-in segmentation. However, the actual 3D generator remains mediocre with little progress on mesh and texture quality — currently low tier.
Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · AI Texturing · AI Rigging · Split into Parts · Image · Free · Studio
One of the first to offer 3D AI, training their own models. Nice ecosystem with texturing, rigging, parts, and a 'Create a Kit' feature for generating multiple objects from one image with built-in segmentation. However, the actual 3D generator remains mediocre with little progress on mesh and texture quality — currently low tier.
Common Sense Machines (CSM) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Follow Common Sense Machines (CSM) on X (Twitter) for the latest news, updates, and announcements.
Follow @CSM_aiCommunity rating · out of 5
Community rating
11 ratings · 1 written review
Rank, ELO and votes are frozen season results. Cost, runtime and sample outputs are version metadata, not season snapshots.
Arena Rank
#23 / 23
Textured ELO
876
Geometry ELO
907
Win Rate
39%
802 wins · 1,248 losses
Total: 2,050 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.60
Typical runtime: 4.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#22 · 917 ELO
In December 25, CSM AI ranked #23 (876 ELO), compared with #22 (917 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 holds a 41 point advantage, so CSM AI fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, CSM AI won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2.
Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while CSM AI focuses on fidelity.
#21 · 947 ELO
In December 25, CSM AI ranked #23 (876 ELO), compared with #21 (947 ELO) for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 holds a 71 point advantage, so CSM AI fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, CSM AI won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 39% for Hunyuan 3D v2.1.
Hunyuan 3D v2.1 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while CSM AI focuses on fidelity.
#20 · 961 ELO
In December 25, CSM AI ranked #23 (876 ELO), compared with #20 (961 ELO) for Forge v2.0.
Forge v2.0 holds a 85 point advantage, so CSM AI fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, CSM AI won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 46% for Forge v2.0.
CSM AI also tends to finish generations faster (4.0 min vs 5.8 min).
#19 · 962 ELO
In December 25, CSM AI ranked #23 (876 ELO), compared with #19 (962 ELO) for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D holds a 86 point advantage, so CSM AI fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
During this season, CSM AI won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 41% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while CSM AI focuses on fidelity.
What was the Top 3D AI rank for CSM AI in December 25?
In December 25, CSM AI finished at #23 with 876 ELO and 2,050 community votes.
How much does it cost to generate with CSM AI?
CSM AI reports an average generation cost of $0.60 per test with a typical runtime of 4.0 min.
How did CSM AI compare with Sloyd AI v2 in December 25?
In December 25, CSM AI ranked #23 (876 ELO), compared with #22 (917 ELO) for Sloyd AI v2. Sloyd AI v2 holds a 41 point advantage, so CSM AI fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. During this season, CSM AI won 39% of its judged matches in this arena, compared with 40% for Sloyd AI v2. Sloyd AI v2 often returns meshes quicker (1.3 min) while CSM AI focuses on fidelity.
