Free · Image · Commercial Use · API · Open Source · Split into Parts
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
Meta's first step into 3D — part of the Segment Anything family. Focused on 3D reconstruction rather than fine detail; generates splats first, then converts to mesh. Shapes are accurate but textures are blurry. Also features body pose extraction. Open source, so great for experimentation, but quality doesn't match paid options.
11% win rate · 419 votes across modes
SAM 3D (Meta) · 1 video reviews
Reviews 1–1 of 1
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
13 ratings · 3 written reviews
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#21 / 21
Textured ELO
786
Geometry ELO
869
Win rate · all modes
11%
44 wins · 375 losses
Total: 419 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.02
Typical runtime: 55s
Nearby ranks in Textured
#20 · 852 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (786 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #20 (852 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 holds a 66 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 11% of its judged matches overall, compared to 26% for TRELLIS.2.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#19 · 874 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (786 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #19 (874 ELO).
Wonder3D holds a 88 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 11% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for Wonder3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 4.0 min).
#18 · 927 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (786 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #18 (927 ELO).
Pixal3D holds a 142 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 11% of its judged matches overall, compared to 36% for Pixal3D.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
#17 · 980 ELO
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (786 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #17 (980 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 194 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
SAM 3D wins about 11% of its judged matches overall, compared to 47% for N4D-2.5.
SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for SAM 3D?
SAM 3D is sitting at #21 with an arena ELO of 786. It has participated in 419 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with SAM 3D?
SAM 3D reports an average generation cost of $0.02 per test with a typical runtime of 55s.
When should I choose SAM 3D over TRELLIS.2?
SAM 3D is ranked #21 (786 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #20 (852 ELO). TRELLIS.2 holds a 66 point advantage, so SAM 3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. SAM 3D wins about 11% of its judged matches overall, compared to 26% for TRELLIS.2. SAM 3D also tends to finish generations faster (55s vs 8.0 min).
