Polycount Control · Multi-view Input · AI Texturing · Image · Free · Commercial Use · API · 4K Texture
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
Cloud-based AI 3D generator supporting text-to-3D and image-to-3D with PBR textures up to 4K resolution. Offers polygon control from 50K to 1.5M, multi-image input, AI texturing/retexturing studio, and remeshing with quad/triangle retopology. GLB export optimized for Unity, Unreal, Blender, and 3D printing. API and webhooks available. ~$0.18/generation on paid plans, with a free tier and currently free Pro plan ($20/mo value).
43% win rate · 834 votes across modes
Community rating · out of 5
Community rating
3 ratings · 1 written review
Live performance in the current season. Closed seasons use recorded snapshots.
Arena Rank
#17 / 21
Textured ELO
996
Geometry ELO
941
Win rate · all modes
43%
359 wins · 475 losses
Total: 834 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.28
Typical runtime: 7.0 min
Nearby ranks in Textured
#16 · 1000 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #17 (996 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #16 (1000 ELO).
Sloyd AI v3 holds a 4 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for Sloyd AI v3.
Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
#18 · 920 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #17 (996 ELO) while Pixal3D currently sits at #18 (920 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 76 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 36% for Pixal3D.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#15 · 1001 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #17 (996 ELO) while N4D-2.5 currently sits at #15 (1001 ELO).
N4D-2.5 holds a 5 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for N4D-2.5.
Triverse 3.0 also tends to finish generations faster (7.0 min vs 8.0 min).
#19 · 855 ELO
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #17 (996 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #19 (855 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 maintains a 140 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Triverse 3.0 wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 22% for Wonder3D.
Wonder3D often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 is sitting at #17 with an arena ELO of 996. It has participated in 834 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Triverse 3.0?
Triverse 3.0 reports an average generation cost of $0.28 per test with a typical runtime of 7.0 min.
When should I choose Triverse 3.0 over Sloyd AI v3?
Triverse 3.0 is ranked #17 (996 ELO) while Sloyd AI v3 currently sits at #16 (1000 ELO). Sloyd AI v3 holds a 4 point advantage, so Triverse 3.0 fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Triverse 3.0 wins about 43% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for Sloyd AI v3. Sloyd AI v3 often returns meshes quicker (2.0 min) while Triverse 3.0 focuses on fidelity.
