TencentARC's image-to-3D model (SIGGRAPH 2026) that back-projects pixel features directly into 3D space for near-reconstruction-level fidelity with PBR textures. Pixel-aligned approach preserves fine surface detail that traditional latent-diffusion-based 3D AI tends to lose. Fully open source under MIT license with ComfyUI support — you can run it locally or via the published model weights. A different lineage from Tencent's Hunyuan3D, despite the shared parent organisation.
Arena Rank
#15
Overall ELO
938
Geometry ELO
979
Win Rate
44%
Arena Votes
Total: 1,004 votes
Average Generation Cost
$0.42
Typical runtime: 8.0 min
Curated from neighboring ranks
#14 · 943 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #15 (938 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #14 (943 ELO).
TRELLIS.2 holds a 5 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 44% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for TRELLIS.2.
#16 · 899 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #15 (938 ELO) while Wonder3D currently sits at #16 (899 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 39 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 44% of its judged matches overall, compared to 29% for Wonder3D.
Wonder3D often returns meshes quicker (4.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
#13 · 981 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #15 (938 ELO) while Triverse 3.0 currently sits at #13 (981 ELO).
Triverse 3.0 holds a 43 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths.
Pixal3D wins about 44% of its judged matches overall, compared to 48% for Triverse 3.0.
Triverse 3.0 often returns meshes quicker (7.0 min) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
#17 · 873 ELO
Pixal3D is ranked #15 (938 ELO) while SAM 3D currently sits at #17 (873 ELO).
Pixal3D maintains a 65 point lead, which usually translates to steadier community votes.
Pixal3D wins about 44% of its judged matches overall, compared to 23% for SAM 3D.
SAM 3D often returns meshes quicker (55s) while Pixal3D focuses on fidelity.
What is the current Top 3D AI rank for Pixal3D?
Pixal3D is sitting at #15 with an arena ELO of 938. It has participated in 1,004 community votes so far.
How much does it cost to generate with Pixal3D?
Pixal3D reports an average generation cost of $0.42 per test with a typical runtime of 8.0 min.
When should I choose Pixal3D over TRELLIS.2?
Pixal3D is ranked #15 (938 ELO) while TRELLIS.2 currently sits at #14 (943 ELO). TRELLIS.2 holds a 5 point advantage, so Pixal3D fans tend to focus on prompts that highlight its strengths. Pixal3D wins about 44% of its judged matches overall, compared to 44% for TRELLIS.2.
